#PLANETARY ANNIHILATION TITAN DESTROY MODS#
#PLANETARY ANNIHILATION TITAN DESTROY PLUS#
#PLANETARY ANNIHILATION TITAN DESTROY MAC#

#PLANETARY ANNIHILATION TITAN DESTROY MODS#

Advanced modding support for modders who would like to create amazing mods and changes to the game and much much more! Key Features Include:

#PLANETARY ANNIHILATION TITAN DESTROY MAC#

Don’t just win, annihilate!ĭeveloped for Windows, Mac & Linux, Planetary Annihilation boost incredible graphics with a unique art style. And take over an entire galaxy in a dynamic single-player mode with procedurally generated content. Arm asteroids and send them on planet-destroying collision courses. Learning to Play Guide: īlow up everything, anywhere dominate with punishing spacecraft, robots, and other futuristic machines of war. From Earth-like planets to Gas Giants and red glowing Lava worlds. With titians I think that this will become less likely not more.īy the way.Planetary Annihilation is a new next generation RTS that takes the familiar gameplay from Total Annihilation and expands it to a planetary scale. For it to be we would have to see the kind of trench warfare around landing zones that was originally envisioned. I don't think the model of land, build ragnarok and blow up the enemy planet is particularly useful though. Had I done that my asteroids would still have been used just a bit later and my team would have won. It still had a few of my side's units on it when it fired. For much cheaper then the hallies I could have built the ragnarok on the metal planet. I launched the rocks, but the annihilaser came online before they arrived. I was alone on my one planet out of five and so grabbed 4 asteroids to destroy the 4 enemy held and contested planets. I lost a team game just last night for not building one. Of course there are circumstances in which the ragnarok is still useful. You might as well take the planet intact. Then you win anyway because even if you can't take my base you can wipe out all of my metal and win by economy. And while you're doing this I can't throw up a Holkins within range of your build site to kill the titian before it finishes why? Oh you have a big land army to come and kill my Holkins and my land army can't beat it. Of course you instead build an antinuke as soon as you hit the ground.

#PLANETARY ANNIHILATION TITAN DESTROY PLUS#

Right now this is what I'm seeing and it's likely application: you invade my planet probably with the orbital titian 30000 metal, you transport an army to defend at least against air attack, plus enough fabbers to build really fast probably at least 20000 metal, then you build the titian 60000 metal, then I nuke the whole operation for 62000 metal (I can reclaim 12 of it). 'Well, if you aren't gonna throw away your metal against my turrets I guess I'll start building a Ragnarok and give you no choice.' I also like how it's the ultimate tool in forcing your enemy to have to come to you. But much harder to use since you need to successfully take and hold at least a little pocket of the surface to 'smash' the planet. I do very much like some of the dynamics it sets up though, it's a great turtle cracker, and you now have an option to demolish planets no matter what the system composition is, no halley planets? doesn't matter. I think in practice it'll be much more difficult to use than the metal price alone would suggest, and there are only very particular circumstances in which it would be the best option. The amount of build power you need to be able to apply in one area to get it built in a reasonable time is still nothing to sneeze at, and you need to be defending the engineers while they do there thing, AND there's a hot minute of charge up before the thing actually sets itself off once it's built. Presumably you'd want to use it on a planet that is contested, but a losing battle.

Click to expand.Yeah, but you're investing 60k metal into blowing up your own investment.

Planetary annihilation titan destroy